EDUCATION

Missing Voices: A Harvard Class on Black Women in Politics

Harvard University, Cambridge, USAFri Oct 17 2025

A Harvard University course focusing on black women in politics has sparked discussion.

Course Overview

The class, titled "History 167: Race, Gender, and the Law Through the Archive," highlights notable figures like:

  • Michelle Obama
  • Stacey Abrams
  • Kamala Harris

It aims to explore the impact of black women in politics, grassroots organizing, and law during the 20th century and beyond. Topics include:

  • Reproductive rights
  • Non-binary people
  • Black feminism

Criticism and Exclusions

However, the course has been criticized for excluding prominent conservative black women. Figures like:

  • Zora Neale Hurston
  • Roberta Church
  • Dr. Mildred Jefferson

are notably absent. Hurston, a renowned writer and Republican, and Church, who served in the Eisenhower and Nixon administrations, are left out. Dr. Jefferson, the first black woman to graduate from Harvard's Medical School and a vocal advocate against abortion, is also missing from the syllabus.

Course Content and Objectives

Professor Myisha Eatmon, one of the instructors, did not respond to inquiries about the course content. The course includes readings from:

  • Critical race theorists
  • Former Black Panther leaders

Learning objectives involve understanding:

  • Intersectionality
  • The role of black women in reproductive rights
  • The impact of Jim Crow on black women

Criticism and Balanced Perspectives

Critics argue that the course presents a one-sided view of political history. Brenda Thiam, an ambassador for Project 21, a group advocating for black conservatism, noted that the course focuses solely on liberal women in politics. She suggested including figures like:

  • Condoleezza Rice
  • Mia Love

to provide a more balanced perspective.

Acknowledging Value

Despite the criticism, Thiam acknowledged that the course offers value. It allows students to learn about the contributions of black women in politics and consider their own paths in the field. The debate highlights the importance of presenting diverse viewpoints in educational settings.

questions

    Could the exclusion of conservative black women from the course be a deliberate attempt to shape students' political views?
    If the course is about black women in politics, why are the only men mentioned in the article the presidents Eisenhower and Nixon?
    Are the instructors deliberately avoiding conservative figures to push a particular narrative about black women in politics?

actions