National Guard Deployments: Legal Battles in Tennessee and West Virginia
Tennessee: Governor's Authority Under Scrutiny
In Tennessee, courts are examining the legality of Governor Bill Lee's decision to deploy the National Guard to Memphis. Critics argue that the state constitution restricts such deployments to cases of rebellion or invasion, requiring legislative approval.
- Deployment Details:
- Troops have been patrolling neighborhoods.
- Lack arrest powers.
Part of a federal task force aimed at reducing crime.
- Key Figures:
- Governor Bill Lee: Deployed the National Guard.
Mayor Paul Young: Did not request the Guard's presence but supports the task force.
- Task Force Achievements:
- Made significant arrests.
- Issued numerous citations.
West Virginia: Governor's Authority Challenged
In West Virginia, a judge is reviewing Governor Patrick Morrisey's decision to send up to 300 National Guard members to Washington, D. C. A civic group claims the governor overstepped his authority, arguing that state law limits out-of-state deployments to specific emergencies.
- Governor's Defense:
Morrisey's office defends the deployment under federal law.
- Judicial Review:
- Judge ordered the state to focus on the legality of the governor's actions.
- Deployment could last until late November.
Broader Context
These deployments are part of a broader effort to combat crime in the nation's capital. Despite a declared crime emergency by President Trump, the Justice Department reports that violent crime in D. C. is at a 30-year low.
- Deployment Details:
- Over 2,300 Guard troops from various states patrolling under federal command.
- Supported by hundreds of federal agents.
Implications
These legal battles highlight the ongoing tension between state and federal authorities over the use of the National Guard. The outcomes could set precedents for future deployments and the balance of power between governors and the federal government.