New Michigan Vote to Block Corporate Campaign Cash Faces Legal Fight

A ballot measure called Proposal 2 won 81% of the vote in Michigan. It bans companies and contractors that hold more than $250,000 in state contracts from giving money to political campaigns. The idea is to keep big money out of elections. Many voters saw the measure as a step toward cleaner politics. The vote reflects a strong public desire to curb corporate influence.

The Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed a lawsuit to stop the proposal from taking effect. They argue that limiting donations infringes on free speech rights. Public utilities have also taken the case to federal court. Patrick Wright, a lawyer for the center, says the rule would let the government police a huge amount of political talk. The center claims the restriction would criminalize speech about elections. They warn that the rule could be used as a weapon in partisan battles. The utilities joining the suit also fear regulatory overreach.

Groups that support the proposal—Clean Water Action, Voters Not Politicians, and newly elected state representative Joanna Whaley—want to be part of the defense. Their attorney, Samuel Bagenstos, wrote that the language was crafted to be constitutional and that they are ready for the expected legal fight. Supporters argue that the proposal protects the democratic process from wealthy interests. They say the measure reflects the will of the majority. Wright maintains that only parties directly harmed can intervene in court. He explains that these groups lack legal standing, meaning they cannot officially join the case. He notes they can only submit amicus briefs, not take part in hearings or negotiations.

If the courts do not pause the law, it will become active ten days after the Board of State Canvassers certifies it. That points to early December. A judge could still delay the start date if they grant an injunction. The plaintiffs have not yet asked for a preliminary injunction, but they say they will likely file one this week. They are preparing their motion now. They hope to convince the court that the proposal should not go into effect.