Protecting Animals and People: A Look at Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 16627
European UnionFri Feb 14 2025
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 16627 is a special bacteria used to help preserve fresh plant materials for animal feed. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently reviewed this bacteria to see if it was still safe to use. The EFSA found that the bacteria is still safe for animals and the environment. However, there are some concerns about people who might come into contact with it. The bacteria can cause skin and respiratory issues. This means that anyone handling it should be careful. The EFSA also noted that there wasn't enough information to say whether the bacteria could irritate eyes.
The bacteria is used to make silage, which is a type of animal feed. Silage is made by fermenting fresh plant materials, like grass or corn. This process helps to preserve the nutrients in the plants, making it a good food source for animals. The bacteria helps to make this process more efficient. The EFSA did not find any new evidence that would change their previous conclusions about the safety of the bacteria. This means that the bacteria is still considered safe for animals and the environment.
The EFSA also noted that there is no need to assess the effectiveness of the bacteria in the context of renewing its authorization. This means that the bacteria is already known to work well for its intended purpose. The EFSA's review is part of a larger effort to ensure that all feed additives are safe and effective. This is important because animal feed can have a big impact on the health of animals and the environment. The EFSA's review of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 16627 is a good example of how this process works.
https://localnews.ai/article/protecting-animals-and-people-a-look-at-lactiplantibacillus-plantarum-dsm-16627-50819d35
continue reading...
questions
Could the lack of data on eye irritation potential be a cover-up for more serious health risks?
How does the EFSA ensure that the additive
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
DSM 16627 remains safe for all animal species over time?
Are there any undisclosed financial interests influencing the EFSA's decision to renew the authorisation?
actions
flag content