POLITICS
Salvador's Leader Stands Firm on Deported Man
Washington, D.C., USAMon Apr 14 2025
El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele made a bold statement during a meeting with former U. S. President Donald Trump. He declared that he would not send back a man who was mistakenly deported to his country. The man in question is Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
The Justice Department had previously acknowledged that Garcia should not have been sent to El Salvador. This was due to an immigration judge's 2019 order that barred his removal to the country. The Supreme Court had also labeled Garcia's removal as illegal. They directed the administration to facilitate his return while respecting the president's authority.
The situation became more complex when Secretary of State Marco Rubio weighed in. He argued that the foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president, not by a court. He also stated that no court in the United States has the right to conduct the country's foreign policy.
Attorney General Pam Bondi added to the confusion. She said that if El Salvador wanted to return Garcia, the U. S. would facilitate it by providing a plane. However, she emphasized that the decision was up to El Salvador, not the U. S.
The exchanges came after top White House adviser Stephen Miller made a controversial statement. He claimed that Garcia was sent to the right place, despite the Justice Department's repeated assertions of an administrative error. He also said that if Bukele were to return Garcia, he would be deported back to El Salvador.
The Trump administration had previously struck a $6 million deal with El Salvador. This was to imprison deportees who were alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and the street gang MS-13. Both gangs have been labeled as foreign terrorist organizations by the administration.
An immigration judge in 2019 found Garcia to be affiliated with MS-13, an allegation he denies. The federal judge presiding over the case noted that Garcia has no criminal record in the U. S. or in El Salvador. The gang membership charge came from a singular unsubstantiated allegation.
The judge found that the evidence against Garcia consisted of nothing more than his Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie. There was also a vague, uncorroborated allegation from a confidential informant. This informant claimed Garcia belonged to MS-13’s “Western” clique in New York, a place he has never lived.
Miller argued that Garcia’s alleged membership in MS-13 meant that the order barring him from being returned to El Salvador was null and void. However, this position has not been taken in court. The judge, in a ruling backed by the Supreme Court, directed the administration to facilitate Garcia’s return.
continue reading...
questions
Could the mistaken deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia be part of a larger plot to test the effectiveness of international deportation policies?
Will Kilmar Abrego Garcia be offered a job at the U.S. immigration office to help them avoid future deportation mix-ups?
What measures are in place to prevent future administrative errors in deportation cases?