TECHNOLOGY

Samsung's Exynos 2500: A Step Back in the Chip Race

Mon May 26 2025
The tech world was buzzing with anticipation for Samsung's Exynos 2500. However, the excitement quickly turned into disappointment when leaked benchmarks revealed its struggles. The Exynos 2500, designed for Samsung's top-tier Galaxy S25, was supposed to be a game-changer. Unfortunately, it fell short in both single-core and multi-core performance tests. This isn't the first time Samsung's in-house chip has lagged behind competitors like Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Apple. The Exynos 2500's 10-core CPU, with its unique configuration, failed to deliver the expected power. Even Xiaomi's XRING 01 outperformed it, leaving the Exynos 2500 with just one victory against Google's Tensor G4. The Geekbench 6 results were a harsh reality check. The Exynos 2500 scored a mere 2, 012 points in single-core and 7, 563 in multi-core tests. These numbers are far from impressive, especially when compared to rivals. The Snapdragon 8 Elite, Apple's A19 and A19 Pro, and the Dimensity 9400 all outperform the Exynos 2500. Samsung's chip is equipped with 12GB of RAM and an Xclipse 950 GPU, a collaboration with AMD. Despite these specs, the Exynos 2500 fails to impress. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 will be the first to feature this chip, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 will get the more powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite. This decision raises questions about Samsung's confidence in its own chip. The Exynos 2500's performance issues are a blow to Samsung's ambitions. The company is known for its innovation, but this chip feels like a step back. The Exynos 2600, Samsung's next chip, is expected to have better yields. However, its performance remains uncertain. Samsung has the potential to turn things around, but the Exynos 2500 serves as a reminder of the challenges ahead. The tech giant needs to focus on improving its chip division to stay competitive. The Exynos 2500's lackluster performance is a wake-up call for Samsung. It's time to step up the game and deliver chips that can truly compete with the best in the market.

questions

    Is the Exynos 2500's poor performance a result of deliberate sabotage within Samsung's chip division?
    If the Exynos 2500 can't beat Google's Tensor G4, does that mean Samsung should consider hiring Google's chip design team?
    What are the potential reasons for the poor yields in the production of the Exynos 2500, and how might Samsung address these issues in future chipsets?

actions