San Francisco Stands Strong Against Federal Troops
San Francisco Bay Area, USAThu Oct 23 2025
San Francisco showed its resilience when plans to send federal troops for an immigration crackdown were suddenly called off. The city had been on high alert after news broke that over 100 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents and other federal officers were set to arrive at the US Coast Guard base in Alameda. This move had sparked outrage among local leaders and residents, who saw it as an unnecessary and intimidating presence.
The decision to cancel the deployment came after a phone call between President Trump and San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. Trump mentioned that he would give the mayor a chance to handle the situation locally. This change of heart surprised many, especially since protests had already started. Hundreds of people gathered outside the Coast Guard base, holding signs and expressing their opposition to the federal troops. The atmosphere was tense, with police using flash-bang grenades to clear protesters as CBP vehicles entered the area.
Among the protesters was Josh Aguirre, who brought his dog to his first-ever protest. He was concerned about the impact on families in his community, especially those with children. Raj, an educator, also joined the protest with his 10-year-old daughter. He believed that the federal troops would see the unity and strength of the community rather than just troublemakers.
The threat of sending troops to San Francisco was part of a broader pattern by the Trump administration to target Democratic-led cities. Trump had previously sent troops to Los Angeles and Chicago and attempted to do so in Portland. Local leaders in San Francisco had been preparing for this possibility for months. Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, calling it a tactic straight out of a dictator's playbook. He vowed to sue the administration if troops were deployed.
Mayor Lurie and other local officials had made it clear that they would not stand by idly. They promised to challenge any federal deployment in court and ensure that the city's residents were protected. The community had also mobilized, with groups organizing rallies and vigils to support affected residents. City supervisor Jackie Fielder warned of the potential shutdown of daily life if federal agents were deployed, comparing it to the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Despite Trump's claims that the operation was necessary to combat crime, local leaders insisted that crime rates were under control. They pointed to falling crime statistics and increasing police recruitment as evidence. The city's homicide rate was expected to be the lowest since 1954, according to reports.
https://localnews.ai/article/san-francisco-stands-strong-against-federal-troops-8e4fff43
continue reading...
questions
What are the ethical implications of using federal troops for immigration enforcement in local communities?
What evidence supports the claim that San Francisco residents want federal troops in their city?
What are the potential long-term effects of deploying federal troops in urban areas for immigration enforcement?
actions
flag content