POLITICS
Schools Face New Rules for Federal Cash
USAFri Apr 04 2025
Federal cash for schools is now tied to strict rules about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. The administration has sent a clear message: follow the law or risk losing funds.
Schools and states have just 10 days to confirm they are complying with federal civil rights laws. This move is part of a broader effort to challenge DEI policies, giving the administration more control over how federal money is used. The administration argues that many schools have ignored their legal duties, using DEI programs to favor one group over another.
The certification process involves signing a document that reminds schools of their legal obligations. It also includes detailed legal analysis from the administration. The message is clear: certain DEI practices can break the law, especially if they give an advantage to one race over another. Schools that don't comply could lose federal funding, including grants and contracts, and might even face legal action under the False Claims Act. Title I funding, which supports low-income areas, is specifically at risk.
State education offices must sign the certification and ensure that school systems do the same. This follows a February memo that declared any policy treating students or staff differently based on race is illegal. The memo aimed to combat what it described as widespread discrimination in education, often against white and Asian American students.
Critics have pushed back, arguing that this move contradicts promises to give more control to schools and states. The new memo sets the stage for financial penalties, similar to those used against colleges. Schools are struggling to understand what practices might violate these new rules, but the administration's guidance has been unclear. The February memo banned the use of race in decisions related to admissions, hiring, financial aid, and more, citing a recent Supreme Court decision on affirmative action.
The American Federation of Teachers is fighting back, suing to block the February memo. The union argues that the certification requirement is illegal and that federal money cannot be withheld without due process. The union's president criticized the administration for using federal aid as a weapon to enforce its political agenda.
Schools across the country are now in a scramble to figure out how to comply with these new rules. The administration has clarified that some practices, like Black History Month celebrations, are allowed. However, many schools have been accused of advancing discriminatory policies under the guise of DEI initiatives.
The administration's actions have sparked a heated debate about the role of DEI in education and the limits of federal control over schools. As schools navigate these new rules, the future of federal funding and educational policies remains uncertain.
continue reading...
questions
What legal basis does the administration have to demand compliance with federal civil rights laws in this manner?
Will there be a 'DEI compliance' stamp on all federal funding checks?
How does the administration define 'discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion practices' and what specific examples do they provide?