SCIENCE

Science Under Siege: The Fight for Facts in Medicine

Boston, USATue Oct 21 2025

The world of science is facing a tough challenge. Noubar Afeyan, a key figure in the biotech industry, warns that the attacks on science won't stop at mRNA vaccines. He believes this trend will spread to all areas of medicine.

Political Decisions Disrupting Scientific Progress

Afeyan, who co-founded Moderna, has seen firsthand how political decisions can disrupt scientific progress.

  • Last year, the Trump administration canceled a major contract for a bird flu vaccine.
  • They also replaced experts on a federal vaccine advisory board with people who doubt vaccines.

This move has raised concerns about the future of medical research. Afeyan worries that if people start questioning proven treatments like chemotherapy, it will be hard to develop new drugs for diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

Mixed Views from Biotech Leaders

Meanwhile, Arie Belldegrun, another prominent figure in biotech, shares Afeyan's concerns. He criticized a recent FDA decision as political rather than science-based. However, Belldegrun also sees some positive changes. He mentioned potential reforms that could:

  • Speed up drug development
  • Reduce paperwork

Skepticism and Uncertainty

Afeyan, however, remains skeptical. He thinks companies without a vaccine business might be relieved by these changes, but he doubts this will last. He compares the situation to holding onto a tree in a storm, suggesting that these changes might not provide real safety.

The Debate Continues

The debate highlights the tension between political influence and scientific progress. As the world faces new health challenges, the need for evidence-based medicine has never been more critical.

questions

    Could the cancellation of the bird flu vaccine contract be a strategic move to control future pandemics?
    If mRNA vaccines can be questioned, does that mean we should also question why pineapple on pizza is so controversial?
    What are the potential long-term consequences of undermining public trust in the scientific method?

actions