Seattle Police Officers Seek Privacy Over Capitol Rally Attendance

In a surprising turn of events, four Seattle police officers are fighting to keep their names hidden from public records. These officers were present at the January 6, 2021, rally in Washington, D. C. , where then-President Trump encouraged supporters to protest the election results. This rally preceded the chaotic events at the U. S. Capitol that day. The officers, who are current and former members of the Seattle Police Department, initially took legal action against the city of Seattle. They wanted to prevent the release of investigative records related to the January 6 events without their names being hidden. However, the Washington Supreme Court ruled against them earlier this year. The court found that the officers had not proven that revealing their names would violate their privacy rights. The officers have now turned to the U. S. Supreme Court, arguing that their off-duty political activities should not be subject to public scrutiny. They claim that disclosing their names could lead to unfair criticism and vilification, even though they maintain they did not engage in any misconduct. The officers are using pseudonyms in their petition to the Supreme Court. The officers acknowledge they attended the rally but insist they did not break any laws. An investigation by Seattle's Office of Police Accountability supported this claim, finding that the four officers did not engage in unlawful or unprofessional conduct. However, two other Seattle officers who attended the rally were fired for trespassing near the Capitol. Their dismissal was based on violating departmental policies, not the act of attending the rally itself. The investigation recognized that attending a political gathering is a protected right under the First Amendment. Of the six Seattle officers who attended the rally, three were found to have not violated any policies. The conduct evaluation for a fourth officer was inconclusive. All six officers, including the four petitioning the Supreme Court, were interviewed as part of the investigation. They were required to disclose their political beliefs, reasons for attending the rally, and their impressions of the event. The officers claim they were compelled to participate in the investigation under threat of losing their jobs. The legal battle involves the Seattle Police Department and Sam Suekoa, who filed public records requests as a law student. Suekoa's attorney, Neil Fox, stated that their legal team is reviewing the officers' motion for a stay. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how public servants' off-duty political activities are handled in the future.