HEALTH
Sleep Apnea: The Battle of the Mouth Guards
Mon Mar 10 2025
Obstructive sleep apnea is a common sleep disorder that can be treated with mandibular advancement devices (MADs). These devices work by pushing the lower jaw forward during sleep, which helps keep the airway open. There are different types of MADs, and they can be customized or ready-made. They can also be adjusted or not adjusted. This review looked at how well these devices work and how often people use them.
The review found that both custom-made and ready-made MADs can be effective in treating sleep apnea. Custom-made devices are designed specifically for the user, while ready-made devices are a one-size-fits-all solution. The review found that custom-made devices might be slightly more effective, but ready-made devices are more convenient and cheaper. The review also found that adjustable MADs might be better than non-adjustable ones. This is because they can be fine-tuned to fit the user's needs better.
The review also looked at how often people use these devices. Adherence is a big issue with sleep apnea treatment. People often stop using their devices because they find them uncomfortable or inconvenient. The review found that custom-made devices might be used more often than ready-made ones. This could be because they fit better and are more comfortable. However, the difference in adherence was not very big.
The review also found that adjustable MADs might be used more often than non-adjustable ones. This could be because they can be adjusted to fit the user's needs better. However, the review also found that the difference in adherence was not very big.
The review also looked at the side effects of MADs. The most common side effects are jaw pain, tooth pain, and dry mouth. The review found that custom-made devices might cause fewer side effects than ready-made ones. This could be because they fit better and are more comfortable.
The review also found that adjustable MADs might cause fewer side effects than non-adjustable ones. This could be because they can be adjusted to fit the user's needs better. However, the review also found that the difference in side effects was not very big.
The review also found that MADs are a good treatment option for people with mild to moderate sleep apnea. However, they might not be as effective for people with severe sleep apnea. This is because severe sleep apnea can be caused by other factors, such as obesity or a narrow airway.
The review also found that MADs are a good treatment option for people who cannot tolerate CPAP therapy. CPAP therapy is the most common treatment for sleep apnea, but some people find it uncomfortable or inconvenient. MADs are a good alternative for these people.
The review also found that MADs are a good treatment option for people who want to avoid surgery. Surgery is another treatment option for sleep apnea, but it can be risky and expensive. MADs are a good alternative for these people.
continue reading...
questions
What are the potential biases in the studies included in the meta-analysis that could affect the conclusions about MAD efficacy?
What are the ethical considerations in promoting MADs as a primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, especially in cases where CPAP therapy is recommended?
How do the results of this meta-analysis compare with other recent studies on MADs, and what discrepancies exist?
inspired by
actions
flag content