Southern California's Water Woes: Business vs. Environment

Southern California's waterways might soon see less protection. The EPA is redefining what counts as "waters of the United States" under the Clean Water Act. This change could mean more pollution in the region's flood control channels, which might no longer be seen as protected waters. The EPA's new rules focus on economic growth. They aim to speed up development while still protecting water resources. But critics argue that this shift in focus could lead to dirtier rivers, creeks, and oceans. The original Clean Water Act didn't mention economic prosperity. It focused on environmental and human health. Business groups are happy with the EPA's new direction. They see it as bringing clarity to regulations. But environmentalists are worried. They believe the new rules will lead to less protection for nature. Teachers and activists are also concerned. They think the changes will harm the environment. The EPA's new rules are based on a Supreme Court decision. The court said federal anti-pollution rules only apply to waters with a "continuous surface connection" to other protected waters. This has raised questions about streams, wetlands, and paved channels.The EPA plans to use a two-part test to decide which waters are protected. First, it will check if the water in question touches another protected body of water. Second, it will see if the water has surface water during the wet season. This could mean less protection for many wetlands and streams. In Southern California, this could lead to more pollution in flood control channels. These channels often flow into the ocean. It's unclear if the new rules will force agencies to clean up these waterways. If not, pollution could flow more freely. California has its own water protection laws. The Porter-Cologne Act is more stringent than the Clean Water Act. So even if the EPA changes its rules, California might still protect its waters. But critics say the new rules will still cause confusion and uncertainty. Many groups are planning to challenge the new rules in court. They believe the EPA's proposals are unclear and could lead to more pollution. Lawyers say there will be more litigation over these changes. They also expect future administrations to keep changing the rules. In the end, the future of Southern California's waters is uncertain. The EPA's new rules could lead to more development but also more pollution. It's a trade-off that will likely be debated for years to come.