The AI Bill Debate: Why California's Governor Said No

In a surprising move, California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, decided to veto a bill that aimed to control the potential dangers of highly advanced AI models. This bill, SB 1047, was at the center of a heated debate among activists and companies involved in AI development. Supporters warned about the risks of using AI to create dangerous weapons like nuclear or chemical ones, which could lead to massive loss of life. On the other side, opponents argued that strict regulation would stifle AI growth, possibly causing companies to leave California. Newsom acknowledged the real threat posed by AI but believed the bill didn’t provide the right framework for regulation. He expressed concerns about keeping pace with rapidly advancing technology. The veto sparked reactions from various groups, including SAG-AFTRA, a union representing Hollywood actors, which had backed the bill.This wasn't the first time SAG-AFTRA voiced concerns over AI. They’ve been particularly worried about AI being used to create deepfakes without consent. The union saw SB 1047 as a way to address these bigger risks in AI development. Despite their support for other AI bills, this one didn't get traction during its legislative process. In response to the veto, Newsom announced plans to gather experts and continue working on AI regulations next year. This decision highlights the ongoing struggle to balance innovation with safety measures in the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence.