POLITICS

The President's Power Check

USAFri Mar 07 2025
The Supreme Court recently made a big decision. It said that the president can't just ignore laws made by Congress. This is a reminder that our government has three parts: the president, Congress, and the courts. They all have different jobs and powers. The president tried to stop foreign aid. He said he could decide how to spend the money. But the Constitution says Congress controls the money. The president can't just make up his own rules. He can't make treaties, appoint ambassadors, or start wars without Congress. The Supreme Court has said this before. In 1998, they told President Clinton that he can't just ignore laws. The president can't change or cancel laws made by Congress. The president can't decide to stop spending money on things Congress has already decided to fund. The president wanted to stop foreign aid right away. He said he was looking for fraud. But the Supreme Court said no. They told the lower court to be more specific about what the president can and can't do. The president can't just do whatever he wants while the court figures things out. The president's actions were about power, not fraud. He kept giving money to some countries but not others. This isn't about stopping fraud. It's about the president trying to have more power. The Supreme Court's decision is important. It keeps the president from doing whatever he wants. If the president could ignore laws, it would be bad for everyone. People would suffer while the courts tried to figure things out. The Supreme Court's decision stops this from happening. The Supreme Court's decision is a reminder. It's a reminder that our government has three parts. They all have different jobs and powers. No one part can take over. The Supreme Court's decision keeps this from happening. It keeps our government working the way it should. The Supreme Court's decision is good news. It's good news for our democracy. It's good news for the rule of law. It's good news for everyone.

questions

    Could there be hidden motives behind the Supreme Court's decision that go beyond the surface-level interpretation of the Constitution?
    What safeguards are in place to prevent a future president from attempting a similar power grab, and how effective are they?
    If the President were a chef, would he still try to cook his own recipe even if Congress said he had to follow the recipe in the cookbook?

actions