The Pro-Life Illusion: When Anything Means Nothing
Ohio State University, United StatesMon Sep 16 2024
In the early 2000s, I was a student at Ohio State University, involved with an evangelical Christian group. Our discussions on abortion were a minefield of opinions, from liberal to conservative. One group member invoked Eric Rudolph, the Olympic Park bomber and abortion clinic bomber, saying he "couldn't condone what he did, but could see why he would do it. " This elicited a strong rebuke from the rest of us. Years later, I realized that the so-called pro-life movement is, in fact, anti-choice. The hypocrisy is palpable.
The Republican position on abortion is a perfect example. Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, have given inconsistent takes on the matter. Trump, who initially supported overturning Roe v. Wade, is now saying he doesn't support Florida's ban on abortions beyond six weeks. Trump claimed his administration would be "great for women and their reproductive rights," while also announcing plans to make government or insurance companies pay for IVF treatment. It's clear that Trump is trying to court women who support abortion rights.
So, my question to the pro-life crowd is: if some of you are willing to do "anything" to prevent abortions, why aren't you doing that? Because, it seems, it was never about being pro-life. The argument against abortion is often misguided, focusing on a single issue rather than addressing the root causes of unwanted pregnancies. What if, instead, we focused on providing comprehensive sex education, access to birth control, paid maternity leave, and a social safety net to alleviate financial hardships for mothers? Would that not be a more effective way to reduce abortions?
It's laughable to think that someone like Rudolph was willing to "do anything" to prevent abortions. He could have supported birth control, contraceptive access, sex education, maternity leave, and comprehensive health care – actions that would have made a real difference. Instead, he resorted to domestic terrorism.
If you really want to reduce abortions in this country, maybe you should support abortion rights. It seems as if Donald Trump and JD Vance, in their political opportunism, have already decided to do that.
https://localnews.ai/article/the-pro-life-illusion-when-anything-means-nothing-ef7e5bee
continue reading...
questions
Can we reasonably assume that the pro-life movement is genuinely concerned with reducing the number of abortions, given their lack of support for measures that have been shown to be effective in preventing unintended pregnancies?
In the absence of evidence that overturning Roe v. Wade has led to a reduction in abortions, isn't it accurate to say that the move was driven by political ideology rather than a genuine concern for the lives of unborn children?
What evidence is there to suggest that overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to ban abortion has actually reduced the number of abortions in the US, as claimed by some pro-life advocates?
actions
flag content