POLITICS

The Quiet Campaign of Alvin Bragg

Manhattan, New York, USAFri Oct 31 2025

Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, is currently running for re-election. He has chosen to keep quiet about one of his biggest cases: the prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

The Trump Prosecution

In 2024, Bragg's office accused Trump of falsifying business records, leading to a guilty verdict. However, Bragg has not mentioned this case during his 2025 campaign.

Campaign Silence

During a campaign event in October, a supporter congratulated Bragg on the Trump prosecution. Bragg did not respond. Later, during a debate, Bragg listed several high-profile cases his office has handled, but he did not mention Trump. The debate moderator and Republican challenger Maud Maron noticed this omission.

The Case Details

Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records. The case involved a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which Bragg's office argued was an attempt to hide an alleged affair before the 2016 election. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has appealed the conviction.

Bragg's Stance

Bragg has said little about why he is not discussing the Trump case during his campaign. He has pointed to previous statements and briefings when asked about it. Some people wonder if Bragg is avoiding the topic to keep his campaign focused on other issues.

Trump's Response

Trump has called the case against him a "witch hunt" and claims it is politically motivated. He has argued that other agencies did not pursue the case, suggesting it is not a strong one. Despite this, Bragg has stood by his office's work, stating that they followed the facts and the law in the case.

questions

    If Bragg's office is known for prosecuting politicians without regard to party, does that mean he's just really good at finding politicians who break the law, or are politicians just really bad at following the law?
    How does Bragg's handling of the Trump case compare to his prosecution of other high-profile figures, and what does this say about his approach to politically sensitive cases?
    Could Bragg's avoidance of discussing the Trump case be part of a larger effort to suppress information about the prosecution's legitimacy?

actions