TECHNOLOGY

The Surprising Truth: Fancy Car Tech Doesn't Make Drivers Happier

Tue Aug 27 2024
A recent study by JD Power reveals that the latest advanced vehicle technologies in cars might not be as appealing to drivers as automakers think. The 2024 U. S. Tech Experience Index Study, which surveyed over 81,000 drivers, found that while some tech features were popular, many others were underutilized or even considered annoying. For instance, artificial intelligence-based technologies like smart climate control gained recognition, but facial recognition, fingerprint readers, and interior gesture controls were not well-received. Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) also had mixed results. While features addressing specific concerns, like visual blind spots, were appreciated, other ADAS technologies were considered unnecessary by many owners. The hands-on-the-wheel version of active driving assistance ranked particularly low, and the hands-free version did not significantly improve user experience. Interestingly, drivers were not fond of high-end hand-free driving systems like GM's Super Cruise and Ford's BlueCruise. Additionally, passenger screens were negatively reviewed and classified as 'not necessary' by vehicle owners. In terms of brand rankings, Genesis took the top spot for the fourth consecutive year, followed by Lexus, BMW, Hyundai, and Kia. Mazda, Nissan, Ford, Mini, and Dodge were at the bottom. It's important to note that JD Power excluded EV-only manufacturers like Tesla, Rivian, and Polestar from the rankings, as their buyers tend

questions

    Which advanced vehicle technology would you least want to explain to your grandparents?
    Do you believe that the government should regulate the implementation of advanced vehicle technologies in cars to ensure they meet driver needs and expectations?
    Could there be a hidden agenda behind the exclusion of EV-only manufacturers from JD Power's rankings?

actions