ENTERTAINMENT

The Unlikely Rise and Fall of Winnipeg's Notorious Sportscaster

Winnipeg, CanadaTue May 13 2025
A former Winnipeg sportscaster, who later became a convicted bank robber, is the focus of a new true crime documentary. This is not your typical crime story. The documentary, titled "The Sexiest Man in Winnipeg, " is available on Prime Video. It follows the life of Steve Vogelsang, who was once a beloved figure in Winnipeg's sports scene. In 2017, his life took a dramatic turn when he was arrested for robbing six banks across Saskatchewan and Alberta. The documentary is unique in that it features Vogelsang himself as the narrator. He recounts his crimes in detail, even reenacting them for the camera. This approach raises some serious questions about the ethics of true crime documentaries. It's one thing to tell a story from the perspective of the victim or the investigator. It's quite another to let the criminal take the reins. Vogelsang's charisma is evident from the start. Old footage shows him as a confident and engaging news anchor. Interviews with his former colleagues, family, and even his ex-wife paint a picture of a man who was well-liked and respected in his field. This makes his fall from grace all the more shocking. It also makes it harder to reconcile the man he was with the crimes he committed. The documentary's title is a reference to a now-defunct magazine that once dubbed Vogelsang "The Sexiest Man in Winnipeg. " At first, it seems like a cheeky joke. But as the story unfolds, it takes on a darker tone. It's a stark reminder of the contrast between the public image Vogelsang once had and the reality of his actions. One of the most frustrating aspects of the documentary is its lack of depth. It touches on important issues like mental health and the power of media. But it never fully explores them. Instead, it's caught between treating Vogelsang's story as a spectacle and as a cautionary tale. This leaves the audience to draw their own conclusions, which can be problematic. The documentary also struggles with how to portray Vogelsang. Is he a joke? A villain? A complex figure? The filmmakers seem unsure, and this uncertainty trickles down to the audience. It's a missed opportunity to delve deeper into the psyche of a man who went from sports anchor to bank robber. In the end, it feels like Vogelsang is the one benefiting from this documentary. His initial crime spree was a cry for attention, and now he's getting it again. It's a chilling thought, and it leaves one wondering if this is a story that should have been left untold.

questions

    What if the documentary had been titled 'The Most Baffling Bank Robber in Canada' instead?
    How does the documentary's focus on Vogelsang's charisma and past success as a sportscaster influence the audience's perception of his crimes?
    If Vogelsang's spirit animal was a different animal, how might that have changed the tone of the documentary?

actions