Troops in the Streets: A Risky Move by the President

The recent decision to send national guard troops to Los Angeles has sparked a heated debate. Some veterans are worried that this move could turn the military into a political tool. This is a big deal because the military usually stays out of domestic politics. The last time something like this happened was in 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights marchers. The current situation in Los Angeles is different. Protests against deportation efforts have been mostly peaceful. The governor of California did not want the troops there, but the president sent them anyway. This has raised eyebrows among military veterans. They see it as a political move, using the military for personal gain. One veteran, Maj Gen Paul Eaton, spoke out against this. He commanded troops in Iraq and knows a thing or two about military operations. He warned that this could lead to the use of the Insurrection Act. This law allows the president to deploy the military against insurrection or rebellion. It's a big step and not something to be taken lightly. The president's memo about this deployment is also concerning. It's written in broad terms, allowing for a nationwide mobilisation. It even authorises the military to be deployed against anticipated protests. This is a first in the US and has many people worried. The military has always prided itself on being above politics. This move could change that. It could lead to a situation where the military is seen as "Trump's generals" or "Biden's generals. " This would erode public trust in the military, as it should be loyal to the constitution, not a particular leader. There are also concerns about how the troops will be used. They could be protecting Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, which could lead to confusion among civilians. It's important to remember that the military's job is to protect the country, not to be used as a political tool. The upcoming military parade in Washington DC has also raised eyebrows. It's scheduled for the president's birthday and is seen by some as a celebration of one man, rather than the military. This is not how the military usually operates. It's a professional fighting force, not a tool for personal gain. It's clear that this situation is complex and has many people worried. It's important to remember that the military should be above politics. It should be loyal to the constitution, not a particular leader. It's a delicate balance, and this move could tip the scales.