Trouble in the Ivory Tower: Power Struggles at University of Luxembourg

The University of Luxembourg's Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) is facing serious trouble. Staff members, both past and present, have come forward with claims of a toxic work environment and unfair practices. Several court cases and internal complaints paint a picture of mismanagement and power struggles within the faculty. At the heart of the issue are allegations of discrimination and retaliation. An assistant professor, who wishes to remain anonymous, reported that their promotion process was derailed after they refused to withdraw their candidacy for a seat on the University Council. The professor claims that the dean's actions were retaliatory and that the evaluation criteria were changed after the fact. The evaluation committee acknowledged some inconsistencies in their assessment but stood by their overall decision. The problem seems to be systemic. Several staff members reported a fear of reprisals, which has stifled dialogue and opposition within the faculty. The assistant professor described the issue as one of power, stating that a few positions hold too much authority. The first hearing for the lawsuit is scheduled for 2027, but it could be moved up if the administrative judge considers it urgent. Concerns have also been raised about the recruitment process for an assistant professorship in the law department. The recruitment committee includes the dean and the head of the law department, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. The university has not responded to inquiries about whether it is aware of the faculty's assessment criteria and ranking, or if it believes this aligns with university rules.The rector has downplayed the issues, stating that it is normal for some staff members to feel disappointed about recruitment and promotion outcomes. However, those interviewed by the Luxembourg Times described the issue as systemic, rather than isolated cases. The same few professors often sit on hiring committees, which has led to concerns about transparency and fairness. A former recruiter for the university also came forward with allegations of a toxic environment characterized by a lack of transparency and disorganization. The recruiter claimed that a dean exerted significant influence over the selection committee and was not afraid to show their biases. The university has not responded to these allegations. The public prosecutor's office did not provide information on the number of cases filed against the university and the faculty specifically. However, the Minister of Research and Higher Education stated that 50 people were fired from the university between 2020 and 2025, and four dismissals were contested in court. Two of these appeals were successful, highlighting the need for improved internal HR practices. Disputes that do not escalate into legal action are usually flagged to the human resources department or to internal resources such as the ombuds office. A 2024 annual report by the office recorded 206 new cases, 83 of which concern staff members excluding doctoral candidates. The rectorate acknowledges these ongoing concerns and has approved a promotion scheme for 2025, but tensions remain.