Trump's Winning Streak: What's Happening to the Education Department?

The Supreme Court recently made a significant decision, allowing the Trump administration to fire approximately 1,400 workers from the Education Department. These workers performed crucial roles, including distributing funds to schools and students, and ensuring the protection of everyone's rights. With their dismissal, much of this work will cease.

A Major Precedent

This decision is highly consequential. Typically, the president does not have the authority to dismantle a department unilaterally. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump's actions without providing an explanation. The three liberal justices dissented.

Supreme Court's Pattern of Support

This is not an isolated incident. The Supreme Court has frequently sided with Trump, granting him extensive powers without clear justifications. In this case, they permitted the dismantling of an entire department, a unprecedented move.

Trump's Stance on the Education Department

Trump has been vocal about his intentions to shut down the Education Department, labeling it a "big con job." His education secretary, Linda McMahon, pledged to "put herself out of a job" by closing the department. In March, Trump signed an executive order to dissolve the department, with plans to fire over half of its staff. States, schools, and unions challenged this move, arguing that the president lacks the authority to eliminate a department. Lower courts initially blocked the firings.

Consequences of the Supreme Court's Decision

Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned of the severe repercussions of this ruling. Numerous offices will close or operate at reduced capacity. Offices supporting students with disabilities, ensuring schools comply with regulations, and distributing funds to schools will be significantly impacted. Schools may struggle to obtain the necessary financial resources.

Constitutional Concerns

The Constitution stipulates that the president cannot unilaterally dismantle a department. Legislative authority rests with Congress, which has not voted to eliminate the Education Department. The president is obligated to adhere to the law, but Trump attempted to bypass these constraints. The Supreme Court's decision to permit these firings raises serious constitutional questions.

A Question of Fairness

The Supreme Court is expected to uphold fairness and impartiality. However, its recent rulings suggest a bias in favor of Trump, allowing him to circumvent established rules without explanation. This trend poses a threat to the integrity of the judicial system and the rule of law.