POLITICS

U. S. Strikes in Caribbean Spark Legal Concerns at G7 Meet

Niagara-on-the-Lake, CanadaWed Nov 12 2025
During a recent G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Canada, questions arose about the legality of U. S. military actions in the Caribbean. The U. S. has conducted at least 19 strikes targeting suspected drug vessels, resulting in 76 deaths. However, the lack of transparency and evidence has raised eyebrows among allies. France was the first to openly criticize these strikes. The French foreign minister expressed concerns, highlighting that these operations violate international law and pose a threat to French territories in the region. France has over a million citizens living in these territories, making the issue personal for them. The U. S. claims these strikes are justified under Article 51 of the U. N. Charter, which allows self-defense. Yet, independent U. N. experts argue that using lethal force without a proper legal basis is a violation of international law and amounts to extrajudicial executions. The U. K. has also taken a stand. They stopped sharing intelligence with the U. S. about suspected drug trafficking vessels, believing the attacks are illegal. Colombia followed suit, suspending intelligence sharing until the U. S. halts these strikes. Meanwhile, the G7 ministers discussed Ukraine. They talked about strengthening Ukraine's missile capabilities and investing more in its defense industry. The goal is to pressure Russia into ending the war. Canada announced new sanctions against Russia, targeting its drone program and energy sector. U. S. President Trump's push for peace in Ukraine faces challenges. He wants a ceasefire with forces in their current positions, but Russia demands more territory from Ukraine. The G7 ministers are trying to find a way to end the war, but it's not easy.

questions

    What are the long-term implications of the U.S. conducting military strikes in international waters without clear legal justification?
    How does the U.S. reconcile its actions with international law, particularly the international law of the sea?
    What specific evidence does the U.S. have to justify the strikes against suspected drug vessels in the Caribbean?

actions