Unseen Benefits: Thailand's Climate Change Battle and Beyond

When tackling climate change, the benefits often go deeper than just the obvious. Besides curbing global warming, these efforts can also slash air pollution, boost health, and support other development goals. Imagine a win-win situation where addressing one problem also helps with others. This is what experts refer to as co-benefits. However, these co-benefits aren't always easy to measure or achieve. There are often hidden obstacles, like social and institutional barriers, that can make it tough to see the full picture. Think of it like trying to solve a big puzzle, but some pieces are missing or hidden. A recent study stepped up to this challenge. Researchers created a new way of measuring these hidden barriers. They looked at different aspects of feasibility, like social, institutional, economic, and technological factors. To test this framework, they focused on Thailand. They picked three key areas: transport, agriculture, and residential energy. By assessing the barriers in these sectors, they found that the social and institutional hurdles often caused more delays than economic or technological issues. The findings were eye-opening. The delays due to social and institutional barriers led to a significant increase in PM2. 5 emissions. These are tiny particles in the air that can cause serious health problems. Between 2015 and 2030, and 2040, there was a 24% to 31% rise in these emissions compared to a scenario where there were no barriers. So, what does this mean for Thailand and other countries? The study suggests that this new framework can be used in national policies and project assessments. It could help guide decisions and make climate action more effective. By understanding and addressing these barriers, countries can better integrate climate solutions into their development plans. But the work doesn't stop there. Researchers propose creating an international database of barriers. This could help share knowledge and best practices across different countries and scales. Additionally, linking this work to studies on technological diffusion, transaction costs, and multi-level transitions could make these assessments even more useful. At its core, this study is a call to action. It encourages us to look beyond the surface and consider the broader impacts of climate action. By doing so, we can make more informed decisions and create better, more sustainable futures.