POLITICS
Voices Silenced: Federal Workers Face Leave After Speaking Out
USAFri Nov 14 2025
Jenna Norton, a program director at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), found herself on paid leave after the government shutdown ended. She suspects her outspoken criticism of the Trump administration's actions at NIH led to this decision. Norton has been vocal about the administration's impact on research and participants' health, even organizing a call to action with other scientists. She believes the administration's cuts and changes are worse than people realize, comparing the situation to a "front row seat to the destruction of our democracy. "
The Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees NIH, did not directly address the reason for Norton's leave but labeled her a "radical leftist" in a statement. Norton, however, stands by her beliefs, proudly embracing the label if it means advocating for ethical research policies. Her situation is not unique. Ellen Mei, an Agriculture Department employee and union leader, was also placed on leave after speaking out about SNAP cuts in an interview. She maintained that she only shared the truth about the government's actions, not confidential information.
Both Norton and Mei argue that federal workers have a right, even an obligation, to speak out on public concerns. They point to a Supreme Court decision that supports this right, as long as it doesn't disrupt government operations. Norton acknowledges the risks but believes asserting these rights is crucial for maintaining democracy. She refuses to stay silent, even if it means putting her job at risk. The USDA, meanwhile, declined to comment on Mei's case, stating that furloughed employees are not authorized to speak on behalf of the department.
continue reading...
questions
How does the Department of Health and Human Services' characterization of Jenna Norton as a 'radical leftist' align with the principles of free speech and public service?
Is it possible that the Trump administration is using 'paid leave' as a new form of 'time-out' for federal employees who speak up?
What measures can be taken to ensure that federal employees can express concerns about government policies without fear of retaliation?
actions
flag content