OPINION

Votes, Dollars, and Digital Truths

Virginia Beach and Williamsburg, USAFri Sep 25 2026
Back in 2019, a now-famous episode showed how a simple marker could try to rewrite a weather forecast. During Hurricane Dorian, a public figure used a black marker to adjust a map, trying to make a prediction look right. The point was not the marker itself, but the urge to force reality to fit a preferred story. Today, that same urge shows up when leaders pressure technology to skip inconvenient facts, favor loyal views, or present opinions as hard truth. Artificial intelligence should do the opposite: help people spot verified data, notice different perspectives, and admit when things are uncertain. AI is not meant to be a digital marker that erases uncertainty; it is supposed to be a tool that clarifies, not conceals.

Voters heading to the polls this November are looking at eight decades of midterm patterns. History shows that the party in power often faces a tough night, and this year is no exception. Predictions suggest the House majority could change hands. Some candidates are running on platforms that promise sweeping economic overhauls, arguing that a more collective approach will deliver a better life for everyone. Critics warn that when such ideas are pushed hard, the result can be the opposite of freedom, with strict controls replacing open debate. Abraham Lincoln once warned that a nation can only destroy itself from within, and many think his warning feels timely as ballots are cast.

Meanwhile, back in Washington, tax dollars are being spent on projects that bypass normal budget steps. Reports mention a luxury jet from Qatar costing hundreds of millions, a reflecting pool getting a makeover for fifteen million, a ballroom expansion for three hundred million, and a conflict overseas with a price tag near a hundred billion. Those figures add up to a federal debt already topping forty trillion dollars. One representative from Virginia's first district has been hearing from constituents who feel the pinch, recalling a classic line about being mad as hell and not going to take this anymore. The sentiment reflects a growing frustration over how public money is allocated without full public input.

actions