BUSINESS

Why Are People Still Quiet When You've Made It Safe to Speak?

Thu Jul 31 2025

Creating a safe space for people to share ideas is a great start, but it's not the whole story.

The Playground Analogy

Many leaders focus on making their teams feel secure, but they often forget to encourage bravery. It's like building a playground but not teaching kids how to play on the equipment.

Understanding Psychological Safety

Psychological safety is about making sure people won't be punished or embarrassed for speaking up. It's not about being overly nice or avoiding all discomfort.

  • Benefits: People can contribute ideas, learn, and innovate more effectively.
  • Risks: If safety is the only focus, it can lead to groupthink and a lack of challenge.

The goal should be candor, not just comfort.

The Role of Bravery

Even in safe environments, fear can still hold people back. Humans naturally avoid discomfort and fear judgment. Just telling people it's safe to speak up doesn't erase years of fear.

Bravery is needed to overcome this fear. It means doing something difficult even when it's scary, like speaking up when your voice is shaky.

The Leader's Role

To foster a culture of open communication, leaders need to do more than just create a safe space. They should:

  • Actively invite dissent
  • Listen without defensiveness
  • Reward those who challenge the status quo

Leaders should also model bravery by:

  • Owning their mistakes
  • Asking tough questions
  • Taking risks

The Employee's Role

Employees also have a role to play. They should:

  • Embrace discomfort
  • Learn to challenge constructively
  • Choose to speak up even when it feels frightening

Psychological safety is meaningless if no one takes advantage of it.

Conclusion

In short, both leaders and employees need to work together. Leaders must create a safe environment and model bravery, while employees must choose to be brave and speak up. Only then can a culture of open communication and innovation thrive.

questions

    Could the emphasis on psychological safety and bravery be a distraction from deeper issues within the organization, like unethical practices or poor leadership?
    How can organizations measure the effectiveness of their psychological safety initiatives in fostering brave communication?
    Is there a hidden agenda behind the push for psychological safety, perhaps to make employees more compliant and less likely to question authority?

actions