Why Did Republicans Boot Mike Turner?

Rep. Mike Turner once seemed like a rising star in the Republican party. He was even appointed chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. But recently, he got the boot from his fellow Republicans. Why? Because they thought he wasn't "MAGA" enough. Let's look back at how Turner got to this point. Turner's political journey began in 1993 when he ran for mayor of Dayton, Ohio. He was a Republican in a heavily Democratic city, but he won because he was seen as a moderate, reasonable candidate. His background in civic engagement and his ability to connect with voters helped him secure two terms. His style of governance was all about competence, ethics, and pragmatism. He was detail-oriented and hands-on, which sometimes led to friction with the Democratic city commission. One of the first big issues he faced was gay rights, and he took a conservative stance, disappointing some. After losing his third mayoral race, Turner set his sights on Congress. He was elected in 2002 and became known as an "urban Republican. " He was seen as someone who could work across the aisle and understand the needs of cities. He even once suggested that House members should stay out of foreign policy, a position that seems ironic given his later support for Ukraine. In Congress, Turner was a reliable Republican vote, but he did occasionally cast votes that looked more Democratic, like supporting minimum wage increases. He was also involved in non-partisan causes and tended to the interests of his district, particularly Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. As the years went by, Turner's district became more Republican due to redistricting. He seemed to shift to the right, becoming more combatively anti-Obama and voting against controversial initiatives. During the Trump years, he didn't stand out as a maverick. He voted against Trump's impeachments and supported him in various controversies. But Turner's downfall came when he was seen as too bipartisan, especially in his support for Ukraine and the certification of the 2020 election. He was removed from his chairmanship because he didn't fit the current Republican mold. It's a stark reminder that in politics, balance and bipartisanship can sometimes be seen as old-school and outdated.