Why The Washington Post Isn't Picking a Presidential Candidate This Time

The Washington Post has decided not to endorse any presidential candidates this year or in the future, according to an announcement by its publisher, Will Lewis. This choice was made by the paper's owner, Jeff Bezos, who blocked an endorsement for Vice President Kamala Harris. Lewis said this isn't a sign of taking sides or abdicating responsibility, but rather a way to uphold values like character, courage, and respect for freedom. The Post has endorsed candidates since 1992, but Lewis wants to return to the old practice of not backing any White House hopefuls.This move has sparked criticism from past and present Post employees. Marty Baron, the former editor, called it "cowardice". Famous reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein also expressed their disappointment, highlighting the Post's own investigations into Donald Trump's threats to democracy. Eight columnists at the Post called the decision a "terrible mistake", suggesting the Post should make clear its commitment to democratic values. Even the Washington Post Guild, a union representing newsroom members, voiced concern that this decision may erode readers' trust. In a similar move, the Los Angeles Times also decided not to endorse candidates. Their editorial board was asked to analyze candidates' policies but chose to remain silent instead. The Post's announcement led to some readers canceling their subscriptions, showing the strong reactions to these decisions.