Andrew Huberman
American neuroscientist and podcaster (born 1975)
Summary
Andrew David Huberman is an American neuroscientist and podcaster. He is an associate professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at the Stanford University School of Medicine. He has been the host of the popular health and science focused podcast Huberman Lab since 2021, and has a Google H-index of 45 with over 14,742 citations. Huberman has drawn criticism from scientists for promoting dietary supplements and for making poorly evidenced health claims.
Originally created by Jamesbrianbounds
8/8/2016, 8:54:25 PM
Modified
5/19/2026, 6:19:35 PM
Recent revisions
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1355049264|1355049264]] by [[Special:Contributions/GeoEvan|GeoEvan]] ([[User talk:GeoEvan|talk]]) He's actually self critical on rare occasions so this unhelpful clarification is actually false.
He appears to be a scientist himself
Modeled after Jien-Wei Yeh
Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-24167-92|~2026-24167-92]] ([[User talk:~2026-24167-92|talk]]) to last revision by Bon courage
/* Podcasts */ source is too weak esp. for embedded medical claim
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1349126185|1349126185]] by [[Special:Contributions/Raffybund|Raffybund]] ([[User talk:Raffybund|talk]]) The whole point of including the references here is that this has been repeatedly contested as "biased" or whatever, even though there is consensus for it per a RfC. [[WP:LEDECITE]] says "Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many [lede] citations"
Manual of Style: Keep the content. No need to overlink, with RS introduced here. The actual references are below in the rest of the controversy.
/* Podcasts */ Same, if it was a medical journal. But a music rag doesn't help the optics here.
/* Podcasts */ Op-ed. And name spamming doesn't help. If it was a medical journal... maybe.
Restored revision 1346877694 by [[Special:Contributions/Donkeysonski|Donkeysonski]] ([[User talk:Donkeysonski|talk]]): We don't do criticism/controversy sections on [[WP:BLP]], refer to [[WP:NOTCRIT]], this is already covered under career
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1339782810|1339782810]] by [[Special:Contributions/Zenomonoz|Zenomonoz]] ([[User talk:Zenomonoz|talk]])
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1346764701|1346764701]] by [[Special:Contributions/Raffybund|Raffybund]]: Huberman states this exact quote in the cited podcast interview; source quality can be discussed on talk. It's worth noting the csq source you've restored was written by the podcast host with the same surname.
WP:Primary source. And not reputably published (random podcast with host of the same surname with zero editorial oversight)
rm overlinking
This does not apply, as we are using his actual words verbatim. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1342084411|1342084411]] by [[Special:Contributions/Raffybund|Raffybund]] ([[User talk:Raffybund|talk]])
/* Early life and education */ Same issue: follow the secondary source with editorial oversight, not primary and editorializing.
/* Podcasts */
/* Podcasts */
