Network of the Department of Government Efficiency
Summary
The network of the Department of Government Efficiency consists of affiliates and allies associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in the second presidency of Donald Trump. DOGE personnel entered or joined various federal agencies with the stated purpose of modernizing information technology, maximizing productivity, and cutting excess regulations and spending within the federal government. They took control of information systems to facilitate mass layoffs. DOGE actions have met with various responses, including lawsuits.
Originally created by Alenoach
5/4/2025, 5:52:37 PM
Modified
5/19/2026, 4:19:31 AM
Recent revisions
/* Table */ not in e c listed twice
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1354955497|1354955497]] by [[Special:Contributions/Czarking0|Czarking0]] ([[User talk:Czarking0|talk]]) self-rv other way around
/* Table */ Cavanaugh not in e, c listed twice
removed spacing between "="
/* Allies */ renamed Trump transition
/* Size */ added that there were at 45 DOGE officials in October 2025 in one of Vought's shutdown plans
Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}}
/* Table */ tag
fix
replaced: offically → officially, occured → occurred, minor ce
Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}}
/* Table */ tag
/* List of notable DOGE network members */ tag
/* "DOGE Kids" */ how about "indicated": there's no statement about Elez breaking any policy, just that "The forensic analysis also revealed that Elez sent an email with a spreadsheet", see https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.636609/gov.uscourts.nysd.636609.116.1.pdf; it's not what we say, but what Bloomberg and Verge say, so we can't be accused of making an inference that isn't in our sources
/* "DOGE Kids" */ add details from source
Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1353843324|1353843324]] by [[Special:Contributions/MetalBreaksAndBends|MetalBreaksAndBends]] ([[User talk:MetalBreaksAndBends|talk]]) I'd say a document can allege, but if you wish, I'll change to stated.
[[WP:BLPCRIME]]. From what i've seen, it applies when referring to court proceedings in 2ndary sources.
/* "DOGE Kids" */ documents don't "allege"; the source for our claim is Bloomberg, we could cite it directly if need be; breaking policy may not amount to any crime
Fixed enough, no longer neccessary.
/* "DOGE Kids" */ more accurate
