Wikipedia contributions by Responsible?

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One NZ")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One.nz")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One.nz")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes known as "One NZ")

Created

Created on 11 November

This incredibly awkward phrase is used mainly by those who have a vested interest in the stadium, seemingly because Christchurch City Council tried to have it both ways and give the stadium one name before it sold the rights to a second name. (Sources: multiple [[Christchurch City Council|CCC]] websites, onenewzealandstadium.co.nz, Populous (architects) and W.A.M. (architects))

Alternative title in recent years – the common name is "Across the Line" and has been since 1990; show is now off air indefinitely.

individual editions have their own article; main article is [[Real Tennis World Championship]]

dealt with in [[Real Tennis World Championship]]

[[WP:AES|←]]Redirected page to [[North v South (disambiguation)]]

created

Created

created

There have been two notable Red Houses in Manhattan in history ([[Red House (Upper West Side)]] and the Harlem hotel/sports ground that became the nearby [[Metropolitan Park (Manhattan)]]); so, AIUI this redirect needs to point to the main disambiguation page.

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

There have been two notable Red Houses in Manhattan in history ([[Red House (Upper West Side)]] and the Harlem hotel/sports ground next to [[Metropolitan Park (Manhattan)]]); so, AIUI this redirect needs to point to the main disambiguation page.

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

[[Red House (Upper West Side)]] and [[Metropolitan Park (Manhattan)]]; there have been two Red Houses in Manhattan

now [[Red House (Upper West Side)]]

Responsible? moved page [[Red House (Manhattan)]] to [[Red House (Upper West Side)]]: Adjust/fix parentheses/disambiguator: Unfortunately, there is another notable "Red House" in Manhattan's history, the 19th-century Red House hotel and sports ground in Harlem, which is dealt with briefly in [[Metropolitan Park (Manhattan)]] (East Harlem) but would have significant usage too. Specifying that the apartment building is on the UWS seems the most logical disambiguation; will also re-do the linked...

Responsible? moved page [[Red House (Manhattan)]] to [[Red House (Upper West Side)]]: Adjust/fix parentheses/disambiguator: Unfortunately, there is another notable "Red House" in Manhattan's history, the 19th-century Red House hotel and sports ground in Harlem, which is dealt with briefly in [[Metropolitan Park (Manhattan)]] (East Harlem) but would have significant usage too. Specifying that the apartment building is on the UWS seems the most logical disambiguation; will also re-do the linked...

{{Short description}}

Date needs confirmation on Commons

2020 final and reference

Undid vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/Sportzlove|Sportzlove]] from 1 Jan 2025 that was never repaired. Also made some copyedits

Undid most of [[Special:Diff/1312361969|1312361969]] by [[Special:Contributions/Anifail Aneglur Iawn|Anifail Aneglur Iawn]] ([[User talk:Anifail Aneglur Iawn|talk]]), unhelpful revisions

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1312404573|1312404573]] by [[Special:Contributions/Anifail Aneglur Iawn|Anifail Aneglur Iawn]] ([[User talk:Anifail Aneglur Iawn|talk]]), unsourced

redundant (he was the last born)

That the edit history includes "User:Coastnzme" and "User:NZMECOASTNZ" doesn't bode well for neutrality or a decent article. IP address [[Special:Contributions/Special:Contributions/122.56.54.82|122.56.54.82]] was also evidently from that company [[New Zealand Media and Entertainment|(NZME)]]; half its edits were about their radio and news titles. [[WP:COI|This is COI editing, it's not allowed]].

Pointless POV clutter, and a dead link

Little future for the station now, but this article was so obviously written/edited by company employees. Have removed most of the advertorial phrases, corporate-speak and promotions for iHeart, corporate website etc.

The encyclopedia doesn't advertise brands by using EXCITED ALL CAPS; see [[MOS:ALLCAPS]] and [[MOS:STYLIZED]]

Reverted 'recentist' changes and corrected mis-spellings

Rm tag; was fixed in intervening 15 years

Hatnote move – reads more logically

/* Administrative county */ On 'desktop' computer view, the body text was badly squeezed in between the map and the bottom of the article Infobox. The captions have important info but are much longer than is usual for a left-aligned image. Centre-aligned the map at the end of the section instead.

/* Use in film and television */

2006/2016 Planet Earth – this was a major factor in causing its high popularity, not incidental. No source seems to have actually called this the best-known song in genre.

Reverted unexplained edits and deletions

/* League standings */ punctuation

undid misguided automated edits by Orion gavi, 19.12.2025

undid possible error

possible error

likely error

A notable name but mainly as a translation, which can go in main body of the text. Little scope for a full section (and if you're in France, it isn't "another country"). "The American night" seems to be rarely used unselfconsciously in English; in fact the phrase crops up separately in cinema articles with no reference to the film technique: see— https://www.bfi.org.uk/lists/five-films-watch-if-you-love-stand-me —&— https://mediacityfilmfestival.com/program/it-is-night-in-america-ana-vaz-2022/ —

Expanded and sourced Timeline/history sections and intro ("150 days out for Te Kaha"); rearranged "Progress" section into chronological order. (The 2022 cost "blowout" hadn't been explained in the Timeline.) Created sections for "2026" and "Features" of the stadium's design.

Linebreak broke the formatting of map caption; kept the sponsor name bold, but moved into the next section, as in [[Lang Park]]. Similar formatting in the similar naming situation of [[Kardinia Park (stadium)|Kardinia Park]]. "For sponsorship reasons" is near-universal wording, and it is not a "DisplayTitle".

Make disambig, as the term has 3 different uses

disambig.

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One NZ")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One.nz")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes rendered as "One.nz")

A current alternative name (sponsor company sometimes known as "One NZ")

[[WP:AI|AI]]-generated site, not a suitable source ([[WP:RSML]]). The article's also been deleted (404 error).

Danny Baker's use of the song as a theme predates Chris Evans's, I believe (2002 as opposed to 2006 when Evans' R2 drivetime began). – Added the "In Popular Culture" section for Simpsons and the other parody versions that weren't the original song.

That wasn't a "reference" as stated and it isn't the same song, it's a parody

It usually isn't possible or credible for Wikipedia to say outright that nothing happened in a given year. See almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia. Good timelines leave gaps, allowing for sources of new information which can always be discovered. It's far preferable that that fills a gap, rather than proves the timeline wrong. If a source literally said "nothing (important) happened", then it would have some backing, but other than that, it'd be unencyclopedic.

It usually isn't possible or credible for Wikipedia to say outright that nothing happened in a given year. See almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia. Good timelines leave gaps, allowing for sources of new information which can always be discovered. It's far preferable that that fills a gap, rather than proves the timeline wrong. If a source literally said "nothing (important) happened", then it would have some backing, but other than that, it'd be unencyclopedic.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.

It's far more encyclopedic to add sections only when events become known, because saying that nothing happened can leave the timeline open to error – see almost every history timeline outside of this topic area on Wikipedia.