Wikipedia contributions by TompaDompa

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Creating redirect.

Creating redirect.

Creating article.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1356006817|1356006817]] by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-16968-40|~2026-16968-40]] ([[User talk:~2026-16968-40|talk]]): Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[Supernovae in fiction]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1354269535|1354269535]] by [[Special:Contributions/Mases007|Mases007]] ([[User talk:Mases007|talk]]): Clearly a [[WP:Good faith]] edit—however, see [[Talk:List of largest empires/Archive 11#Tibetan Empire as largest in the world at 850-950 and 1150?]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1353872025|1353872025]] by [[Special:Contributions/El komodos drago|El komodos drago]] ([[User talk:El komodos drago|talk]]): Markley pp.187–188: "When he first awakens on Barsoom, Carter finds himself among the ten-foot-tall, four-armed race of Tharks, nomadic raiders whose tribal structure, stoicism, and indifference to 'modern' values identifies them with American Indians."

Not needed.

/* Trans-Neptunian planets */ Expand.

/* Box office */ Remove material that failed verification.

/* Titan */ Very well, talk page discussion started. I'm removing this in the meantime, both per [[WP:BRD]] and [[WP:ONUS]] (and of course [[WP:PROPORTION]]/[[WP:IPCV]]/[[MOS:POPCULT]], which is the reason the addition was removed by [[User:Maplestrip]] and me in the first place).

See also.

/* See also */ [[Solar System in fiction]].

See also.

/* See also */ [[Solar System in fiction]].

/* See also */ [[Solar System in fiction]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1353217433|1353217433]] by [[Special:Contributions/Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]): The cited source is not a source on the overarching topic—[[Saturn in fiction]]/[[Titan in fiction]]—but a source on the example. [[MOS:POPCULT]] explains what kind of sources should be used for articles like this. Any further discussion should take place on the talk page.

Undid 2 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1353132816|1353132816]] until [[Special:Diff/1353140838|1353140838]]: Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[Saturn in fiction]] (or more specifically [[Titan in fiction]]).

/* History */ Anacoluthon.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1352734834|1352734834]] by [[Special:Contributions/Greenknight dv|Greenknight dv]] ([[User talk:Greenknight dv|talk]]): Secularism isn't a religion.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1352669882|1352669882]] by [[Special:Contributions/Avyaayr|Avyaayr]] ([[User talk:Avyaayr|talk]]): Several issues, apparently citing Wikipedia inline being the most conspicuous.

/* Box office */ Failed verification.

Undid 2 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1351875686|1351875686]] until [[Special:Diff/1351876041|1351876041]]: Unexplained removal of sourced content.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1351469643|1351469643]] by [[Special:Contributions/HistoryHubArchive|HistoryHubArchive]] ([[User talk:HistoryHubArchive|talk]]): To make a long story short, no. This is all based on a misreading of the sources and an unwillingness to engage with what the academic sources actually base their conclusions on. The citable maps that have been brought up in discussion do not agree with the depicted extent.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1351201357|1351201357]] by [[Special:Contributions/Mr.FarisAlIslam|Mr.FarisAlIslam]] ([[User talk:Mr.FarisAlIslam|talk]]): Restoring earlier version. See [[List of largest empires]] and [[Umayyad Caliphate]].

Undid 2 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1351190866|1351190866]] until [[Special:Diff/1351191130|1351191130]]: Restoring earlier version. It's unclear exactly where this area estimate comes from, but all I found from a quick look was "The surface of this huge area was on the order of five million square miles" on page 37. That's just a rough off-the-cuff estimate ([[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]), and the existing source is a much higher-quality one for the purposes of historical area estimates anyway.

Undid 4 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1351197028|1351197028]] until [[Special:Diff/1351200208|1351200208]]: Restoring earlier version. It's unclear exactly where this area estimate comes from, but all I found from a quick look was "The surface of this huge area was on the order of five million square miles" on page 37. That's just a rough off-the-cuff estimate ([[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]), and the existing source is a much higher-quality one for the purposes of historical area estimates anyway.

Creating redirect.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1350906502|1350906502]] by [[Special:Contributions/Brivic92|Brivic92]] ([[User talk:Brivic92|talk]]): Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[Neptune in fiction]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1350879594|1350879594]] by [[Special:Contributions/Prezbo|Prezbo]] ([[User talk:Prezbo|talk]]): I am fairly certain that the citations to "Leyva, p. 19" (reference 7) and "Leyva, 19-20" (reference 9) are to this specific source. Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable to use, see [[WP:NONENG]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1350880243|1350880243]] by [[Special:Contributions/Prezbo|Prezbo]] ([[User talk:Prezbo|talk]]): What? No. Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable to cite, and helpful in "Further reading" sections both to editors who might use them to edit the article further and to readers who might read them to get additional information. Plenty of readers of the English-language Wikipedia speak (and more to the point, read) more languages than just English.

/* History */ [[WP:REDLINKS]] are a feature, not a bug.

/* History */ The sources agree: 1894.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1350482953|1350482953]] by [[Special:Contributions/HistoryHubArchive|HistoryHubArchive]] ([[User talk:HistoryHubArchive|talk]]): Both of these changes were for the worse. Archive links and author links are helpful, and the choice of map is the outcome of a fair amount of previous discussion.

Undid 2 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1350426470|1350426470]] until [[Special:Diff/1350426545|1350426545]]: Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[stars in fiction]] (or more specifically [[Tau Ceti in fiction]]). The source cited here is on a different topic, namely Project Hail Mary. See [[MOS:POPCULT]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1349691594|1349691594]] by [[Special:Contributions/Wcdowchb|Wcdowchb]] ([[User talk:Wcdowchb|talk]]): [[WP:Good-faith]] edit, but still no. Scientific/medical/academic publications—which the cited source is not—do not use this term.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1349690504|1349690504]] by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-23829-94|~2026-23829-94]] ([[User talk:~2026-23829-94|talk]]): Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[Tunguska event in fiction]].

Undid 2 revisions from [[Special:Diff/1349340837|1349340837]] until [[Special:Diff/1349346744|1349346744]]: Coming in second or ninth place isn't a record, and this kind of emphatic language is inappropriate.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1349136444|1349136444]] by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-23344-03|~2026-23344-03]] ([[User talk:~2026-23344-03|talk]]): See talk page.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1348194576|1348194576]] by [[Special:Contributions/The Fifth Horseman|The Fifth Horseman]] ([[User talk:The Fifth Horseman|talk]]): Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[Tunguska event in fiction]].

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1347515179|1347515179]] by [[Special:Contributions/Obsidian the Fox|Obsidian the Fox]] ([[User talk:Obsidian the Fox|talk]]): The lead summarizes the body, and this is not in the body (nor should it be).

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1347319849|1347319849]] by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-20182-12|~2026-20182-12]] ([[User talk:~2026-20182-12|talk]]): Superlative-chasing. It is already mentioned that it is the second-highest-grossing animated film of all time.

Expand.

/* Further reading */ Additional source.

/* Further reading */ Additional source.

/* Further reading */ Additional source.

/* Further reading */ Additional source.

/* Symbolism */ See talk page.

/* By achievement */ If it hasn't happened yet, it doesn't go here yet.

/* Box office */ Unsourced, and we don't usually include this anyway.

/* Box office */ Excessive precision.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1347030256|1347030256]] by [[Special:Contributions/Aepeul|Aepeul]] ([[User talk:Aepeul|talk]]): Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, [[stars in fiction]] (or more specifically [[Tau Ceti in fiction]]).

Let's try this.

/* Film */ Tweak.

/* Film */ Add invisible comment.

/* Film */ Human civilization as a whole rather than the United States specifically, both per the sources and by watching the film.

/* Film */ Various fixes.

/* Film */ Stray markup.

/* Film */ Typo fix.

/* Film */ Typo fix.

/* Politics and propaganda */ Expand.

Let's have images that depict things that are described in text next to the text where they are described.

/* Symbolism */ Expand.

Let's use the previous, less emphatic phrasing.

/* Symbolism */ Expand.

/* Symbolism */ Agreed, I just never got around to that part with all the other stuff going on.

Typo fix.

/* Film */ Maintenance templates.

/* Music */ Maintenance template.

/* Politics and propaganda */ Maintenance templates.

/* Television */ Maintenance templates.

/* Visual arts */ Maintenance template.

/* Comics and cartoons */ Maintenance templates.

/* Video games */ Maintenance templates.

/* Typography */ See talk page.

Copyediting.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1346471918|1346471918]] by [[Special:Contributions/OrdinaryOtter|OrdinaryOtter]] ([[User talk:OrdinaryOtter|talk]]): Going by [[Template:Quote box/doc]], it seems that a dash should not be used. I don't personally have any strong feelings about it one way or the other, but it seems like something that, if it is to be changed, should be discussed in a broader forum.

Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1346387636|1346387636]] by [[Special:Contributions/KaijuEditor|KaijuEditor]] ([[User talk:KaijuEditor|talk]]): That wasn't a [[WP:Minor edit]], and the link is quite an [[WP:EASTEREGG]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Template.

/* Variants */ Expand.

/* Commercialization */ Image.

/* Commercialization */ Expand.

/* Commercialization */ Expand.

/* Destruction */ Expand.

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

/* Destruction */ Copyediting.

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

/* Symbolism */ Expand.

/* Sports */ Not needed now.

/* Coins and currency */ Not needed now.

/* Visual arts */ Not needed now.

See also.

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].

Per [[MOS:POPCULT]]: "A well-crafted article or section on a topic's cultural representation should be based on reliable sources that address the topic broadly." and "If examples are included, they should be drawn from sources that discuss the primary topic rather than being selected arbitrarily. Their inclusion should reflect their prominence in relevant literature." Thus, inclusion should be based on sources on the overarching topic of this article: [[Statue of Liberty in popular culture]].