The Supreme Court recently decided not to bring back a Montana law that needed minors to get their parents' okay for an abortion. This law, passed in 2013, never actually took effect because of legal battles. Montana argued that parents should have a say in their children's healthcare decisions. But the Montana Supreme Court disagreed, saying the law went against the state constitution, which protects minors' rights.

Justice Samuel Alito, known for his conservative views, agreed with the Supreme Court's decision not to take the case. He thought the case wasn't the best example but supported the main legal arguments. Justice Clarence Thomas also agreed with Alito's statement. Montana officials wanted the U. S. Supreme Court to review the case, saying the state court's decision went against parents' rights, which are protected under the 14th Amendment.

The law in question required minors to get parental consent or a judge's approval for an abortion. The state court ruled that a minor's right to make reproductive decisions is very important and that Montana didn't show why its interests were more important than these protections. Montana is different from other Republican-led states because abortion is still widely available there, even after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The Montana Supreme Court has long supported abortion rights under the state constitution, and in 2024, voters approved a ballot initiative to protect these rights.

This decision highlights the ongoing debate about parental rights and minors' autonomy, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like abortion. It also shows how states can have different laws and protections, even on controversial topics. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case means that, for now, Montana's laws on this issue will remain in place.

MONTANA LAW

Montana's Parental Consent Law for Abortion: What Happened?

Continue reading...