Jon Gruden just scored a big win in his fight against the NFL. The Nevada Supreme Court said his case can go to trial instead of being pushed into private arbitration. This is a huge deal because it sets a precedent for other workers who might be stuck in unfair arbitration processes.

The court ruled that the NFL's arbitration clause doesn't apply to Gruden because he was no longer an employee when he filed his lawsuit. They also said it would be unfair to force him into arbitration. Gruden's lawyer, Adam Hosmer-Henner, celebrated this decision, saying it's a victory not just for Gruden but for all employees facing similar issues.

Gruden's lawsuit against the NFL and Commissioner Roger Goodell started in 2021. He claims the NFL leaked racist, homophobic, and sexist emails he sent while working at ESPN. These emails came to light during an investigation into the Washington football team. Gruden says the NFL's actions forced him to resign as the Raiders' coach and ruined his reputation.

The NFL has said they will appeal this decision. They believe the case should go to arbitration, but the court disagreed. They said the arbitration clause in the NFL Constitution doesn't apply to former employees like Gruden. They also said the arbitration clause in Gruden's contract with the Raiders doesn't prevent him from suing the NFL.

This case is important because it shows how powerful arbitration clauses can be. These clauses are often used to keep disputes out of public courts and away from juries. But in this case, the court said the NFL's arbitration clause is unfair and doesn't apply to Gruden.

Gruden's case is still ongoing, but this decision is a big step forward for him. It also sends a message to other workers who might be facing similar issues. It shows that even if you have an arbitration clause in your contract, it might not always apply.

NEVADA SUPREME COURT

Jon Gruden's Legal Victory: What It Means for Workers Everywhere

Continue reading...