Recent events have put a spotlight on the intersection of science and politics. Some leaders have been making bold statements about health and science, but experts are raising eyebrows. They argue that these claims often rely on weak evidence, preliminary studies, or even personal hunches rather than solid, proven science. Take, for example, the recent change in a m...
The UK is making a big move to change how science is done. The goal? To make research more relevant to people's lives. This isn't just about new rules. It's about shifting the focus to studies that can make a real difference. Why does this matter? Because science has often been about small, controlled experiments. These don't always tell us what happens in the real ...
The chair of a key vaccine advisory group is making waves with new recommendations. Martin Kulldorff, a Swedish-born epidemiologist, leads the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This group helps decide which vaccines kids get and when. Since taking over in June, Kulldorff and his team have made some big changes. They want to remove mercury from cert...
The U. S. Department of Energy recently released a lengthy report on the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The report, however, has been heavily criticized for its questionable approach to climate science. The energy secretary, Chris Wright, claimed that the media misrepresents climate science and argued that global energy poverty is a bigger threat than climate c...
In the world of science and policy, there is a growing need to bridge the gap between researchers and policymakers. This has given rise to a new role: the knowledge broker. These brokers act as intermediaries, helping to translate complex research findings into actionable policies. Understanding how these brokers operate is crucial for effective policymaking. ...
The recent changes in U. S. federal funding for scientific research have sparked a global trend. Countries are now rolling out initiatives to attract American scientists. This shift is not just about filling vacant positions; it's about offering a safe haven for academic freedom. The U. S. has long been a leader in scientific research, thanks to substantial governme...
The European Union is making a significant investment in the future of science. They are setting aside 500 million euros. That is 567 million dollars. This money will be used to attract top researchers from around the world over the next three years. This move comes as a response to recent changes in the United States' approach to science and research. F...
Europe is full of experts talking about biodiversity. They have lots of data on how biodiversity is doing, where it's going, and what can be done about it. But there's a problem. All this knowledge isn't always getting to the people who make the rules. The EU has a big plan to fix this by 2030. They want to get everyone talking and working together better. This...
In recent times, the federal government is expected to move towards a pragmatic approach in handling scientific matters. This shift aims to restore public confidence in government policies, which are rooted in science. The trust in government, especially science-based directives, has plummeted and has made people wary of the regulators. The current administration is ...
Imagine you're in a classroom, and the teacher is saying one thing, but the kids sitting at the front are giving you totally different ideas. That's kind of like what's happening with Trump's science advisors. When Trump started his second term, he picked a few experts to help him with science stuff. Now, you might think these folks would be all about facts and evid...