POLITICS

Big Ad Deal Gets Green Light with a Twist

USATue Jun 24 2025
A huge ad deal just got the okay from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), but there's a catch. The FTC, currently all Republican, said yes to Omnicom buying Interpublic Group for $13. 5 billion. But they added a rule: Omnicom can't steer ads away from platforms based on political views. This means Omnicom can't avoid places like X (formerly Twitter) just because of their political stance, unless their clients specifically ask them to. This rule is unusual. The FTC usually makes companies follow certain conditions when they merge to prevent unfair competition. But this time, they're addressing a specific issue: advertisers pulling out of X after reports of harmful content. X's owner, Elon Musk, has been vocal about this, calling it an "illegal boycott. " The FTC is even looking into Media Matters, a news outlet that encouraged advertisers to leave X. The FTC's concern is that with fewer big players in the ad industry, the remaining ones might start working together in ways that could hurt competition. They mentioned GARM, a group that helped companies avoid harmful content, which shut down due to legal pressure from X. The FTC says this rule won't stop advertisers from choosing where their ads go. They can still ask Omnicom to avoid certain platforms. But Omnicom can't have policies that refuse to work with advertisers based on political views. Both Omnicom and Interpublic Group are happy with the deal. They expect it to close in the second half of 2025. The FTC's decision was made by two Republicans, with one commissioner recused. The agency is currently led by three Republicans, as President Trump has not yet nominated new commissioners to replace the two Democrats he tried to fire.

questions

    Could the FTC's order be a secret attempt to censor conservative voices by making it harder for advertisers to avoid controversial content?
    How does the FTC's decision to approve the Omnicom merger with conditions align with its typical approach to preventing anticompetitive effects?
    Is the FTC's investigation into Media Matters a cover-up to protect certain political interests from being exposed?

actions