ENVIRONMENT

EPA's Bold Move: Climate Rules in the Crosshairs

USA, WashingtonTue Jul 29 2025

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Donald Trump's administration has taken a significant step to undo a key climate regulation. They want to get rid of a 2009 finding that said greenhouse gases, like carbon dioxide, are bad for public health and the environment. This finding has been the basis for many rules to cut emissions from cars, power plants, and other sources.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Announces Plan

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced this plan on a podcast. He said this move would be the biggest deregulation in U.S. history. He believes that climate regulations are hurting the economy and costing Americans a lot of money. The EPA's proposal will go through a long review process, including public comments, before it's final. Environmental groups are expected to challenge this in court.

Rolling Back Tailpipe Emission Limits

The EPA is also planning to roll back limits on tailpipe emissions. These limits were meant to push automakers to sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

Environmental Groups React

Environmental groups are not happy with this move. They say it ignores the reality of climate change, which is making weather disasters worse. They also say the EPA is shirking its responsibility to protect people from climate pollution.

Former EPA Leaders Criticize Plan

Former EPA leaders have also criticized this plan. They say it puts millions of lives at risk and goes against the EPA's mission to protect the environment and human health. Conservatives and some Republicans, however, support this move. They say it will undo economically damaging rules.

Legal experts and Democrats say any attempt to repeal the endangerment finding will be an uphill battle. The finding came after a Supreme Court ruling that gave the EPA the authority to regulate greenhouse gases. If the EPA goes through with this, it could erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution and prevent future rules to tackle climate change.

questions

    How does the proposed repeal of the endangerment finding align with the scientific consensus on climate change?
    What evidence supports the claim that the endangerment finding is economically damaging?
    If the endangerment finding is rescinded, will we see a surge in 'Climate Change Denial' themed parties?

actions