How different ways of using cannabis change its effects

The way cannabis is used can greatly affect how much THC ends up in the bloodstream and how it makes users feel. With more people trying out new methods like dabbing and vaping, it's important to understand these impacts. Most studies so far have been done in labs with low-potency cannabis, which doesn't reflect real-world use. A recent investigation looked at how different methods of using cannabis affect THC levels and feelings of intoxication. The study involved 252 participants who used their own cannabis products in their preferred ways. These methods were grouped into four categories: dabbing, vaping, bong-like, and joint-like. The findings showed that dabbing led to higher THC levels and stronger effects compared to using flower products in bongs or joints. This suggests that dabbing might expose users to more THC. However, the high from dabbing and vaping seemed to wear off faster than from other methods. This could mean that the intense effects of dabbing and vaping don't last as long. The study highlights how the method of using cannabis can significantly change the experience. It shows that future research needs to pay more attention to these different methods and the products used with them. Understanding these differences can help users make more informed choices about how they consume cannabis. It can also guide policymakers in creating better regulations for cannabis use. The study also raises questions about the long-term effects of these different methods. For example, does the rapid decline in intoxication levels mean that users might need to consume more frequently? Or could it lead to using more potent products to achieve the desired effect? These are important questions that need further exploration. There is also a need to consider the social and cultural aspects of cannabis use. Different methods of consumption can have different social meanings and may be more or less acceptable in various settings. For instance, dabbing might be seen as more intense or even risky by some, while vaping might be viewed as more discreet and convenient. These perceptions can influence how people choose to use cannabis and how society views these methods. Moreover, the study did not delve into the potential health risks associated with each method. For example, dabbing involves heating cannabis concentrates to high temperatures, which could release harmful chemicals. Vaping, on the other hand, has been linked to respiratory issues. Understanding these risks is crucial for making informed decisions about cannabis use. Overall, the study provides valuable insights into how different methods of cannabis use can affect THC levels and subjective experiences. It underscores the need for more research to fully understand these impacts and to develop guidelines that promote safe and responsible cannabis use.