TECHNOLOGY

Polygraph Tests: How AI is Making Them More Reliable

KoreaSun Apr 27 2025
Polygraph tests are tools used to detect lies by measuring physiological responses. Traditionally, examiners score these tests manually, but this method can be flawed. Human biases, whether political, regional, religious, or personal, can skew results. Even factors like stress and fatigue can affect an examiner's judgment. To tackle these issues, computerized scoring systems have been developed. These systems aim to reduce human error by automatically analyzing the test charts. However, early versions of these systems weren't perfect. They used linear classifiers, which struggled with the complex, nonlinear nature of biological signals. This led to poor performance. To improve this, deep learning structures, like deep neural networks, were introduced. These networks can handle the nonlinearity of bio-signals better, making them more effective. A recent development is a Korean computerized scoring system that uses a deep neural network. This system was designed to reduce the subjective bias in polygraph tests and to achieve high-accuracy results. The performance of this algorithm was tested, and the results were impressive. It showed recall, precision, and F1 scores of 0. 9681, 0. 9700, and 0. 9683, respectively. These scores suggest a significant improvement over conventional systems that rely on linear classifiers. The use of AI in polygraph tests is a step forward. It shows promise in making these tests more reliable. However, it's important to remember that no system is perfect. Continuous evaluation and improvement are necessary. As technology advances, so should our understanding of its limitations and potential biases. After all, the goal is to create a fair and accurate system that can be trusted.

questions

    What specific advantages does the deep neural network offer over conventional CSS models in polygraph testing?
    If the CSS is so good, can it tell when a politician is being sincere or just practicing their best poker face?
    How does the performance of the Korean computerized scoring system compare to international standards or other CSSs?

actions