Trump's Legal Battle: More About Revenge Than Justice

Trump's recent move to indict former FBI Director James Comey seems more like a personal vendetta than a serious legal pursuit. The case, which many legal experts consider weak, is expected to fall apart in court. But for Trump, the outcome might not matter much. He's already achieved what he set out to do: put Comey through a costly and public legal ordeal.

A History of Legal Vendettas

Trump has a history of using the legal system to target his opponents. He's done this for years, both before and during his presidency. As a businessman, he frequently filed lawsuits against critics and competitors, often with questionable legal grounds. Now, as president, he's using the power of the federal government to go after people he sees as enemies.

The Indictment: A Flawed Case

The indictment against Comey is a clear example of this strategy. The case revolves around testimony Comey gave in a Senate hearing about a leak to The Wall Street Journal. Legal observers point out a major flaw in the case: Comey couldn't have authorized a leak that had already happened. Despite this, Trump pushed for the indictment, even overruling experienced prosecutors who saw no probable cause.

A Personal Grudge

Why is Trump so focused on Comey? It's no secret that Trump holds a grudge against Comey for overseeing the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Trump fired Comey shortly after taking office, and the animosity between them has only grown since then.

The Real Motive

The case against Comey is weak, but that's not the point for Trump. He's using the legal system to punish his perceived enemies, regardless of the merits of the case. And even if the case fails, Trump will likely claim victory, pointing to the trouble and expense he's caused Comey.