In 2025, a political figure, Shri Thanedar, found himself in the spotlight for a reason he probably did not expect. Thanedar, a U. S. Representative, had just introduced a resolution to impeach President Donald Trump. But instead of focusing on his political move, social media buzzed with old allegations. These claims suggested that back in 2010, Thanedar had left behind dogs and monkeys at his New Jersey testing lab after his businesses faced financial trouble.

The story goes back to April 2010. Bank of America sued six of Thanedar's companies because they had not paid back their loans. One of these companies, AniClin Preclinical Services, was home to 118 beagles and 55 monkeys used for testing. The bank offered to cover the costs of caring for these animals during the lawsuit. However, lawyers for Thanedar's businesses did not respond to this offer. Thanedar later stated that he was unaware of this proposal.

Two months after the initial lawsuit, a court-appointed receiver, MorrisAnderson, stepped in. They filed a motion to move the animals to sanctuaries. Initially, lawyers for Thanedar's businesses objected, arguing that the animals should be sold. But they later withdrew their objection. The animals' health conditions during this time remain a topic of debate. Daniel Dooley, the CEO of MorrisAnderson, testified in 2011 that some animals were starving before the receivership began. Thanedar, however, questioned Dooley's account, stating that Dooley had not visited the facility before the receivership.

The animals at AniClin eventually found new homes through local rescues and sanctuaries. Thanedar, when asked about the animals' fate, claimed that he had no idea what happened to them during the three months after the bank took over. He also mentioned that he believed Bank of America was responsible for their care. However, court documents suggest a different story. They show that Thanedar's company ignored the bank's offers to care for the animals and initially opposed the motion to place them in sanctuaries.

The debate over the animals' condition and Thanedar's involvement continues. Some reports suggest the animals were in good health when rescued, while others paint a different picture. The court documents reveal that lawyers for Thanedar's businesses did not respond to the bank's proposals and initially opposed the motion to place the animals in sanctuaries. This raises questions about Thanedar's claim that he had no knowledge of the animals' fate.

The story of the abandoned lab animals is a complex one. It involves financial troubles, legal battles, and differing accounts of the animals' condition. What is clear is that the animals at AniClin were caught in the middle of a dispute. Their fate remains a topic of debate, and the full truth may never be known.

ANIMAL ABANDONMENT CASE

The Mystery of the Abandoned Lab Animals

Continue reading...