CELEBRITIES

New Twist in Hollywood Drama: More Actresses Step Forward

New York, USAWed Feb 19 2025
In a surprising turn of events, Blake Lively has updated her legal case against Justin Baldoni, the director of It Ends With Us. She claims that two other actresses from the film's set are ready to share their own unpleasant experiences with Baldoni or his business partner, Jamey Heath. These actresses have given Lively the green light to use their communications in the legal battle, which could significantly impact the ongoing saga. The actresses involved have not been named publicly to protect them from potential cyberbullying and threats. This move comes as a response to the intense public scrutiny and online harassment that Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, have faced. The film, It Ends With Us, based on a novel by Colleen Hoover, was a massive hit, earning over $351 million globally. The movie was produced by Wayfarer Studios and co-financed by Sony, which handled the marketing and release. The film's success has added to the complexity of the legal battle, as it involves high-stakes decisions and public perception. Lively's legal team has emphasized that the new evidence includes previously undisclosed communications involving Lively, representatives from Sony and Wayfarer, and other witnesses. The complaint highlights that Lively was not alone in raising concerns about misconduct on set, and it details the threats, harassment, and intimidation that followed. This new development could shift the narrative from a personal feud between Lively and Baldoni to a broader issue of workplace misconduct. The two actresses allegedly involved are Jenny Slate and Isabela Ferrer. Slate is well-known for her roles in Parks and Recreation and Everything Everywhere All at Once. Ferrer, on the other hand, is a newcomer to the industry and played the younger version of Lively's character in the film. According to the updated lawsuit, Lively's experiences and those of others were documented as they happened. In May 2023, Lively shared her concerns in a text message with a mutual friend of Baldoni and Heath. She described the situation as "HR nuts" and expressed her discomfort with the behavior of Baldoni and Heath. A few days later, she reported her concerns to a Sony employee, Ange Gianetti. The lawsuit also mentions that another female cast member reported similar issues to Gianetti and one of the film's producers. The amended complaint adds a new claim for defamation based on false statements made by the defendants about Lively since the original complaint was filed. It also includes Jed Wallace and his company as defendants. Wallace is a crisis PR manager who has been working closely with Baldoni's lawyer and crisis PR manager. The lawsuit alleges that Wayfarer co-founder Steve Sarowitz made threatening remarks, comparing his defense of the studio to Israel's defense against Hamas. He allegedly said there would be "two dead bodies" when he was done. This adds a layer of intensity to the already heated legal battle. Since December, Lively has been involved in a legal back-and-forth with Baldoni, with each side trying to gain public support. The dispute has become highly publicized, with both sides refusing to engage in settlement discussions. Lively's updated allegations expand on her initial lawsuit, accusing Baldoni and his PR team of retaliating against her for speaking up about misconduct on set. The legal drama has captivated Hollywood due to the complex web of relationships between the key players. Shortly after cutting ties with Baldoni, WME, which represents Lively and Reynolds, released a statement denying that the couple pressured the agency to drop Baldoni. The litigation has also involved Wayfarer Studios and their public relations representatives, Nathan and Jennifer Abel. Baldoni's lawsuit against Lively also names Reynolds and Leslie Sloane, Lively's public relations representative from Vision PR.

questions

    If Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds were to host a press conference, what kind of memes might the public expect to see?
    If the two actresses were to testify, would their statements be more like a dramatic courtroom scene or a comedy skit?
    What are the potential motivations behind the amended complaint, and how do they align with the initial allegations?

actions