Revamping Forest Restoration: Experts Weigh In On What Really Matters
The Challenge of Measuring Success
Forest restoration is a hot topic, especially in places like the Mediterranean. The European Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR) has set some big goals, but there's a catch. The indicators they use to measure success might not be the best fit for everyone. That's where a recent study comes in.
Expert Opinions
A group of over sixty experts from Spain, with backgrounds ranging from science to sociology, were asked to weigh in on thirty-four different indicators. These indicators came from the NRR, scientific literature, and even some that looked at social and economic factors.
Key Findings
- Deadwood Accumulation: Experts thought this was the least important indicator due to increased wildfire risk.
- Native Tree Species Dominance and Diversity: Highly valued by the experts.
- Socioeconomic Indicators: Experts agreed these should be part of the mix, highlighting positive public perception of restoration.
Missing Pieces
The experts pointed out that the NRR is missing some important indicators, such as:
- Ecosystem resilience
- Natural regeneration
- Fire risk
- Soil erosion
The Solution: A Flexible Framework
The study suggests a flexible, goal-oriented framework. This would balance harmonization with regional adaptation, highlighting indicators that evaluate multiple restoration goals. The aim is to make forest restoration monitoring more effective in Spain and other southern European regions. It could also help in developing national restoration plans.
Critical Thinking
While the study provides valuable insights, it's important to remember that forest restoration is complex. What works in one place might not work in another. It's all about finding the right balance.